This does not, in no way, justify yet another valued newspaper to take to that path. However, THE HINDU person thinks what qualifications have I, to write such things.And by the way, I am not the person who thinks low of THE HINDU, as I have mentioned is my aathangam.True, I have looked around myself in India, and that is why, I have talked about the degeneration I have seen with my own eyes - TV, AANANDA VIKATAN so on and so forth. So, I do think I have a right to express my feelings in my blog.
Has simply brushed away the facts by simply attacking the person who wrote it, rather than looking at a counter view so sad, has unnecessarily crowning me as spokesman to diss THE HINDU further, forgetting the fact that this is my blog, and blogs were supposedly a journal where the owner records his/her own thoughts. Proving this rant, in a true DRAVIDIAN PARTY style, THE HINDU associate: has chosen to divert the issue of poor standard of reporting - my actual issue has turned the rant into a personal blame game (narrow-minded etc.) has chosen to generalize the degeneration and arguing nothing wrong in being de-generated not only that, but also further classification of my concerns as being narrow-minded. It is an outpour of feelings.As I mentioned, THE HINDU is like an English MURASOLI or like an English NAMATHU MGR. (Reference: COMMENTS section of post on THE HINDU)True.My rant is not untrue, however. Basically, it was an outburst.As a true journalist, one of THE HINDU associate has pointed out about my writing (in) capability. The least we can expect from THE HINDU is either true writing or atleast credit for relevant places from where the content is being lifted.Ĭonsidering my previous post about THE HINDU, my language looks poor because I wrote without a spellchecker, and in one shot, without organizing my thoughts. Did the author realize he violated the copyrights, and he could be easily implicated by law, and so the relevant Editor-in-Charge? Running to Bangalore this time may not be useful.It is a pity, we are such a big democratic country, no press control, no censorship, still we do not have a single quality national newspaper (TEHELKA is not a newspaper, it is a refined and more honest JUNIOR VIKATAN) no unbiased one like THE TIMES (as in UK) or like NEWYORK TIMES THE HINDU used to be quite different in good few years back. Did the author think that readers of THE HINDU are so internetologically so impaired and web-access wise so challenged like China, UAE or any other fundamentalistic nation that the readers cannot recognize direct lift-offs from foreign newspapers?3.
Is the Editor-In-Charge so much allergic to internet, they don’t read articles from other newspapers' online versions?2. Chakra today sent me this link about THE HINDU's 'inadvertent lifting of NYTimes inspired article on Alexander' Some obvious questions that pop up are:1. So it seems like in many other people as well.
0 kommentar(er)
